May 06 2024

How to prepare for the CISSP exam: Tips from industry leaders

Category: CISSPdisc7 @ 9:14 am

The Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) is the most widely recognized certification in the information security industry. CISSP certifies that an information security professional possesses extensive technical and managerial expertise for designing, engineering, and managing an organization’s security stance.

In this article, CISSP-certified cybersecurity leaders provide practical tips and strategies to help candidates navigate the extensive study requirements and effectively manage their CISSP exam prep time. Whether you’re just starting your study journey or in the final stages of preparation, these guidelines will help ensure you are well-equipped to tackle the CISSP certification exam.

Biljana Cerin, CEO, Ostendo Consulting

My preparation for the CISSP exam took exactly 10 sunny afternoons while working on a project in Palo Alto. Every day after work, I took “Shon Harris,” at that time the so-called “CISSP exam prep Bible.” I remember studying by the pool, swimming in between the chapters, so overall, it was a fun way to spend these afternoons without feeling like I was missing the sunny California weather.

I divided the contents of the book in a way that allowed me to read it all in eight days, while I dedicated the last two entire days to practicing exam questions and revisiting domains where my answers were incorrect, studying them a bit deeper. I remember that at that time (2013), there was a very popular site where colleagues from the profession would discuss questions or topics they struggled with, and “talking” to colleagues on that platform was of huge help.

The exam itself, I think, took about an hour and a half, and I passed on the first attempt. Now, this may all sound easy, but the truth is that by the time I decided to pursue the CISSP, I already had 13 years of experience, numerous other industry certifications, and had been deeply involved in the cybersecurity field since the day I graduated; my Master’s thesis was also in cybersecurity.

Looking back at the exam itself, I believe that having a strong knowledge foundation, coupled with real-life experience, and a network of colleagues you can always turn to and discuss certain topics you are less familiar with, is the key to success in passing the CISSP exam.

Shannon Brewster
Shannon Brewster, Executive Director, General Manager, AT&T Cybersecurity

Passing the CISSP exam is an ambitious goal, especially if you hope to pass on your first attempt. I recommend a 90-day preparation plan tailored to reinforce key cybersecurity concepts and identify weaker areas through regular practice.

Being intentional with your time is crucial; consider mapping out each domain as a “sprint” and mapping core concepts to learn each week. Schedule daily dedicated study time and regular practice exams. Testing with approved sample questions helps gauge your readiness and pinpoint specific topics you need to shore up on.

Most security professionals will find themselves very strong in the domains they work in most often, and weak in others. Cryptology is the Achilles’ heel for many.

I incorporated tools like handwritten index cards for constant review to boost memory retention. This method of repetition embeds critical information, making it more readily recalled.

An important element of my preparation was participating in a 6-day bootcamp. The bootcamp was a source of confidence because I had the benefit of a thorough review of the all the content that was necessary to understand. It also helped me build a new network of peers who supported each other as accountability partners and encouragement.

Make sure you take the exam within two weeks of a bootcamp to maximize the “cone of learning” on memory retention.

Lastly, don’t forget about the physical dimension, staying focused on your health and wellness throughout your preparation. Deep sleep is required for memory retention and recall, so avoiding alcohol and practicing sleep hygiene will improve your score. I brought a jump rope to my test and stepped out regularly to infuse fresh blood to my brain, vastly improving my focus.

This strategy worked for me to pass on my first attempt, I hope these ideas might work for you.

CISSP exam prep
Ryan Williams Sr., IT Security Analyst, Buddobot

Here’s how I effectively studied for the CISSP certification, relying solely on comprehensive study materials rather than quick-fix dumps or quizlets. This method ensured a deep understanding of the content required to pass the CISSP exam:

1. Bootcamp: I started my preparation with a rigorous week-long bootcamp (40 hours). This intensive course helped establish a solid foundation and highlighted areas where I needed further study. Even though I had over five years of experience in cybersecurity and over ten years in IT, my practical knowledge was only in specific domains (i.e. Security and Risk Management, Asset Security, Communications and Network Security, etc.). A good bootcamp will expose your weak areas and help you to hone in on where you need to obtain more knowledge.

2. Targeted reading: After identifying my weak spots during the bootcamp, I skimmed the Official ISC2 CISSP Common Body of Knowledge (CBK) specifically focusing on those areas.

3. In-depth study guides: I read the ISC2 CISSP Official Study Guide from cover to cover to ensure a comprehensive grasp of all domains. Additionally, I went through the Eleventh Hour CISSP: Study Guide twice, which is excellent for refreshing your memory due to its concise format.

4. Video courses and webinars:

  • I watched Kelly Henderhan’s Cybrary CISSP course twice. Her engaging teaching style and clear explanations helped reinforce the key concepts.
  • Larry Greenblatt’s series, “CISSP Practice Question with Spock & Kirk”, was instrumental in applying theoretical knowledge practically through scenario-based questions.
  • Pearson VUE’s Complete CISSP Video Course was another resource I used, which also included domain challenge questions that tested my understanding as I progressed.

5. Motivational prep: Before the exam, I watched Kelly Henderhan’s motivational video, “Why you WILL pass the CISSP”. This not only boosted my confidence but also put me in the right mindset to tackle the exam.

This structured approach to studying for the CISSP took approximately 6 months, using a mix of reading, practical exercises, and motivational content, equipped me with the knowledge and confidence to successfully pass the exam.

CISSP exam prep
Stein A. J. Mollerhaug, Senior Cybersecurity Advisor

For most people, passing the CISSP exam is the main obstacle. In addition to passing the exam, you must also document at least five years of experience in two or more of the eight CISSP knowledge domains. But don’t worry, if you miss that experience, you can get an associate status while you work on gaining the needed experience. Once the experience is documented, you will get upgraded without the need for a new exam.

You don’t need to follow any official course to sit for the CISSP exam and get CISSP certified, but the feedback from almost all students is that following an official course with an official instructor helps – a lot.

In my experience, there are three critical success factors for passing the exam:

1. Understand the basics of cybersecurity and information technology.
2. Understand how management systems work for the key processes in information security.
3. Be able to apply that knowledge to real life situations or imagined scenarios.

If you are unable to explain how the encryption in AES actually works, you are still fine with regards to the exam. If you don’t know that AES is a symmetrical algorithm and what it can be used for, you have some learning to do before sitting for the exam. This is just one example. CISSP is not a technical course, but as a cyber- or information security leader, you must know the basic technology you are going to use.

Management systems ensure the quality of the security implementations. Standards like ISO/IEC 27001 contain some of the framework for having measurability and the ability to improve your cybersecurity. There are such standards in almost all areas of cybersecurity. Knowledge of them is key to passing the exam.

The exam itself often asks for “best”, “most” or “not”. The key here is that you are to apply your knowledge and experience to find the right answer. Even if you don’t know a specific answer, you should be able to apply your knowledge to find the right answer through the process of elimination. That means you have to think and not just recall from memory when you sit for the exam.

This is also why many find the exam to be very exhausting. For each question, you need to read the answer alternatives and the question, think – and then answer. The good news is that for almost all questions, there will be two answer alternatives that you can easily eliminate – if you know your cybersecurity – and have read the question properly. Then you spend your time to choose between the two remaining.

And another piece of good news: You don’t need to be 100% right, 70% is the requirement for passing. And to destroy a myth: Time is not a key issue. Exhaustion is. Take breaks, even if the clock is not stopping during the breaks.

Andrea Szeiler-Zengo
Andrea Szeiler-Zengo, President of the Women4Cyber Hungarian Chapter

When I decided to get CISSP certified, I signed up for local training, but honestly, I learned more independently than in class.

The CISSP is unlike other exams where you can memorize the answers. You must understand the security domains. When I took the CISSP exam, the cloud and third-party risk sections were a big focus. However, these topics were not discussed in detail in the study materials.

You absolutely need to plan how you will prepare for it.

I gave myself a deadline, registered for the exam, and spent six months studying. I read all the study materials and did practice questions, but I also kept up with news and new technologies.

I tried to set aside 30 minutes each day to review materials. I read on public transport, at the beach, and pretty much everywhere else. The most significant help arrived via my network. They helped me out with questions and motivated me during these challenging days.

You might be asking yourself – why bother getting the CISSP certification in the first place? It makes you more recognizable to employers who trust people holding the certification. And let’s be honest, they’re more likely to pay you more. So, go for it, good luck!

CISSP exam prep
Edwin Covert, Head of Cyber Risk Engineering, Bowhead Specialty

Earning my CISSP in 1999 was a different experience from today’s process. Back then, comprehensive study guides and boot camps weren’t a thing. We had a two-week course delivered in segments—a week-long session followed by three weeks off, then another week to wrap up. We relied heavily on ISC2’s list of recommended books.

Sitting in that George Mason University classroom in Virginia, I was surrounded by a wealth of information security knowledge, a term not yet replaced by cybersecurity. I wanted to absorb everything. The discussions were phenomenal – a constant back-and-forth exchange of ideas among experienced professionals. I mostly listened, soaking it all in, occasionally contributing my thoughts. This became my learning model throughout my career.

The saying goes, “If you’re the smartest person in the room, you’re in the wrong room.” This held true for me. I actively sought out those more experienced in cybersecurity.

My advice is to start small, find mentors, and become a knowledge sponge. Don’t limit yourself to books—seek practical knowledge as well. Talk to veterans in the field, learn from their experiences, and integrate your ideas as you grow.

ISC2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security Professional Official Study Guide & Practice Tests Bundle

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: CISSP Certified Information Systems Security Professional Official Study Guide


May 05 2024

68% Of Data Breach Occurs Due To Social Engineering Attacks

Category: social engineeringdisc7 @ 9:40 am

In the latest edition of Verizon’s Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) for 2024, a concerning trend has been highlighted, a significant 68% of data breaches are now occurring due to social engineering attacks.

This revelation underscores the increasing sophistication and prevalence of these tactics in the cyber threat landscape.

Social engineering exploits the human factor, manipulating individuals into breaking normal security procedures.

The DBIR’s findings suggest that despite advancements in technology, human vulnerabilities remain a critical weak point.

The report indicates that phishing, pretexting, and other forms of social engineering are not only prevalent but are also becoming more sophisticated.

Breakdown of breaches by attack type
Breakdown of breaches by attack type

Verizon’s 2024 DBIR has revised its methodology to provide clearer insights into breaches involving the human element.

It excludes cases of malicious privilege misuse to focus on incidents that could potentially be mitigated through improved security awareness and training.

The Role Of Ransomware And Extortion

The report also sheds light on the role of ransomware and extortion in the cybersecurity threat landscape.

Approximately one-third of all breaches involved these tactics, with pure extortion attacks marking a significant rise over the past year.

This shift indicates a strategic evolution among cybercriminals, who are increasingly leveraging ransomware and extortion to capitalize on their attacks.

Breakdown of breaches by attack type.
Breakdown of breaches by attack type.

The combination of ransomware and other forms of extortion has been particularly impactful, affecting 32% of breaches and being a top threat across 92% of industries surveyed.

This highlights the critical need for organizations to enhance their defensive strategies against these forms of cyberattacks.

Third-Party Vulnerabilities And Preventive Measures

An expanded concept of breaches involving third-party entities was introduced in this year’s report.

This includes incidents where partner infrastructure is compromised or where indirect software supply chain issues occur.

The report notes a 68% increase in such breaches, primarily fueled by zero-day exploits used in ransomware and extortion attacks.

                                            68% increase in such breaches
                                            68% increase in such breaches

This finding emphasizes the importance of diligent vendor selection and the need for organizations to prioritize security in their supply chains.

By choosing partners with robust security measures, companies can significantly mitigate the risk of being compromised through third-party vulnerabilities.

Verizon’s 2024 DBIR provides a stark reminder of the persistent and evolving threats in the digital world.

With a significant portion of breaches attributable to social engineering, the human element continues to be a critical battleground in cybersecurity.

Organizations must prioritize comprehensive security training and robust protocols to safeguard against these insidious attacks.

Meanwhile, the rise of ransomware and extortion, along with the vulnerabilities in third-party partnerships, calls for an urgent reassessment of current security strategies and vendor management practices.

Social Engineering: The Science of Human Hacking

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: Social Engineering Attacks, Social Engineering: The Science of Human Hacking


May 03 2024

Work from Home: Precautions, Risks, and Potential Outcomes

Category: WFHdisc7 @ 3:26 pm

Did you know that working from home carries additional security risks? Fortunately, there are simple — yet critical — steps your employees can take to ensure they can work remotely from home as securely as possible. Even more, these tips will help to make a far more safe and secure home for your employees and their families moving forward.

Via SANS Security Awareness:

The Future of the Office: Work from Home, Remote Work, and the Hard Choices We All Face

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: work from home


May 03 2024

What is Smishing?

Category: Information Security,Phishingdisc7 @ 10:21 am
https://www.sans.org/blog/a-tale-of-the-three-ishings-part-02-what-is-smishing/?

What is Smishing and Why?

Smishing is a type of social engineering attack. Social engineering is when a cyber attacker tricks their victim into doing something they should not do, such as giving money, their password, or access to their computer. Cyber attackers have learned the easiest way to get something is just ask for it. This concept is not new, con artists and scammers have existed for thousands of years, it’s just that the Internet makes it very simple for any cyber attacker to pretend to be anyone they want and target anyone they want.

Phishing is one of the most common forms of social engineering as it’s one of the simplest and most effective and an attack method we are all familiar with. However, both organizations and individuals are becoming not only far more aware of how phishing attacks work, but much better at spotting and stopping them. Phishing is still an effective attack method, but it is getting harder and harder for cyber criminals to be effective with phishing. This is where smishing comes in.

Smishing vs Phishing

Smishing is very similar to phishing, but instead of sending emails trying to trick people, cyber attackers send text messages. The term smishing is a combination of the words SMS messaging and phishing. You may have noticed a rise in random text messages that are trying to get you to click on links or respond to text messages. That’s smishing.

Why the Increase in Smishing Attacks?

  1. It is harder for organizations to secure mobile devices. Security teams often have neither the visibility nor control of employees’ mobile devices like they do for workstations. This means it’s harder to both secure and monitor mobile devices.
  2. There are far fewer security controls that effectively identify and filter smishing attacks. This means when a cyber attacker sends a smishing text message to victims, that message is far more likely to make it and not be filtered.
  3. A text message tends to be much shorter than an email, there is far less context or information, making it harder to determine if the message is legitimate or not. In other words, people are more likely to fall victim.
  4. Texting tends to be far more informal than email, as such people tend to trust and act on text messages more. In other words, people are more likely to fall victim.

The Smishing Attacks

So, what type of text messaging attacks are there? While these attacks are always evolving, some of the most common are detailed below.

Links

The text message entices you to click on a link, often through a sense of urgency, something too good to be true, or simple curiosity. Once you click on the link, the goal is usually to harvest your personal information (by getting you to fill out a survey) or your login and password (to your bank or email account, for example). Notice how, in the link in the message below, the cyber attacker uses HTTPS, an encrypted connection to make the link look more legitimate.

Scams

In these attacks, the cyber attacker will attempt to start a conversation with you, build trust, and ultimately scam you. Romance scams are one common example where cyber criminals randomly text millions of people to find those who are lonely or emotionally vulnerable, build a pretend romance, and then take advantage of them.

Call-Back

Like some phishing emails, the text message has a phone number in it and is urging the victim to call. Once the victim calls the phone number they are then scammed.

What to Do About Smishing Attacks?

While many security training programs focus on phishing, we far too often neglect text based smishing attacks. In fact, this can create a situation where your workforce is highly aware of phishing attacks but may mistakenly think that cyber attackers only use email for attacks. From a training perspective, we recommend you teach people that cyber attackers can use a variety of different methods to trick people, to include both email phishing and text based smishing. For smishing, we do not recommend that you try to teach people about every different type of attack possible. Not only will this likely overwhelm your workforce, but cyber attackers are constantly changing their lures and techniques. Instead, like in phishing training, focus on the most commonly shared indicators and clues of an attack. This way, your workforce will be trained and enabled regardless of the method or lures cyber attackers use. Of note, the indicators below are the same indicators of an email phishing attack.

  • Urgency: Any message that creates a tremendous sense of urgency, trying to rush the victim into making a mistake. An example is a message from the government stating your taxes are overdue and if you don’t pay right away you will end up in jail.
  • Pressure: Any message that pressures an employee to ignore or bypass company policies and procedures. Gift card scams are often started with a simple text message.
  • Curiosity: Any message that generates a tremendous amount of curiosity or is too good to be true such as notice of an undelivered UPS package or receiving an Amazon refund.
  • Sensitive: Any message that requests (or requires) highly sensitive information such as your password or unique codes.
  • Tone: Any message that appears to be coming from a coworker, but the wording does not sound like them, or the overall tone is wrong.

Smishing Minefield: Defusing Text Message Threats

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: Smishing


May 03 2024

2024 Data Breach Investigations Report: Most breaches involve a non-malicious human element

Category: Data Breachdisc7 @ 7:19 am

This spike was driven primarily by the increasing frequency of attacks targeting vulnerabilities on unpatched systems and devices (zero-day vulnerabilities) by ransomware actors. The MOVEit software breach was one of the largest drivers of these cyberattacks, first in the education sector and later spreading to finance and insurance industries.

“The exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities by ransomware actors remains a persistent threat to safeguarding enterprises,” said Chris Novak, Sr. Director of Cybersecurity Consulting, Verizon Business.

In a possible relief to some anxieties, the rise of AI was less of a culprit vs challenges in large-scale vulnerability management. “While the adoption of artificial intelligence to gain access to valuable corporate assets is a concern on the horizon, a failure to patch basic vulnerabilities has threat actors not needing to advance their approach,” Novak said.

Analysis of the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog revealed that on average it takes organizations 55 days to remediate 50% of critical vulnerabilities following the availability of patches. Meanwhile, the median time for detecting the mass exploitations of the CISA KEV on the internet is five days.

“This year’s DBIR findings reflect the evolving landscape that today’s CISO’s must navigate – balancing the need to address vulnerabilities quicker than ever before while investing in the continued employee education as it relates to ransomware and cybersecurity hygiene,” said Craig Robinson, Research VP, Security Services at IDC. “The breadth and depth of the incidents examined in this report provides a window into how breaches are occurring, and despite the low-level of complexity are still proving to be incredibly costly for enterprises.”

Last year, 15% of breaches involved a third party, including data custodians, third-party software vulnerabilities, and other direct or indirect supply chain issues. This metric—new for the 2024 DBIR — shows a 68% increase from the previous period described in the 2023 DBIR.

The human factor remains the primary entry point for cybercriminals

68% of breaches, whether they include a third party or not, involve a non-malicious human element, which refers to a person making an error or falling prey to a social engineering attack. This percentage is about the same as last year. One potential countervailing force is the improvement of reporting practices: 20% of users identified and reported phishing in simulation engagements, and 11% of users who clicked the email also reported it.

“The persistence of the human element in breaches shows that there is still plenty of room for improvement with regard to cybersecurity training, but the increase in self-reporting indicates a culture change that destigmatizes human error and may serve to shine a light on the importance of cybersecurity awareness among the general workforce,” Novak added.

Other key findings from this year’s report include:

  • 32% of all breaches involved some type of extortion technique, including ransomware
  • Over the past two years, roughly a quarter (between 24% and 25%) of financially motivated incidents involved pretexting
  • Over the past 10 years, the Use of stolen credentials has appeared in almost one-third (31%) of all breaches
  • Half of the reaches in EMEA are internal
  • Espionage attacks continue to dominate in APAC region

“The Verizon 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report shows it’s the still the basics security errors putting organizations at risk, such as long windows between discovering and patching vulnerabilities, and employees being inadequately trained to identify scams. This needs to change as a priority because no business can afford to gamble or take chances with cyber hygiene. Just look at Change Healthcare, the breach was executed via an unsecured employee credential and the organization is now facing over a billion in losses. No other organisation wants to find itself in this position,” William Wright, CEO of Closed Door Security, told Help Net Security.

Big Breaches: Cybersecurity Lessons for Everyone

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: 2024 DBIR, data breaches, Verizon data breach report


May 02 2024

VNC Is The Hacker’s New Remote Desktop Tool For Cyber Attacks

Category: Hacking,Security Toolsdisc7 @ 7:26 am

While facilitating remote work, remote desktop software presents security challenges for IT teams due to the use of various tools and ports.

The multitude of ports makes it difficult to monitor for malicious traffic. 

Weak credentials and software vulnerabilities are exploited to gain access to user systems.

Hackers may also use technical support scams to trick users into granting access.  

The Most Targeted Remote Desktop Tools In The Last 12 Months

Researchers identified VNC, a platform-independent remote desktop tool using RFB protocol, as the most targeted remote desktop application (98% of traffic).

The attacks leveraged weak passwords and a critical vulnerability (CVE-2006-2369) in RealVNC 4.1.1, allowing authentication bypass. 

Over 99% of attacks targeted unsecured HTTP ports rather than TCP ports used for application data exchange, which suggests attackers exploit the inherent lack of authentication on HTTP for unauthorized access.

The security of VNCs varies depending on the specific software, while some offer weak password limitations, others leverage SSH or VPN tunnelling for encryption.

VNC uses a base port (5800 for TCP, 5900 for HTTP) with an additive display number, making it difficult to secure with firewalls compared to single-port remote desktop solutions. 

Additionally, pinpointing the origin of VNC attacks is challenging due to attackers using proxies and VPNs, but a significant portion seems to originate from China. 

Attackers target RDP, a remote desktop protocol, for credential-based attacks and exploit vulnerabilities to execute malicious code, as RDP is more likely to be involved in large attacks compared to VNC. 

Flaws Exploited

In one study, 15% of RDP attacks leveraged obsolete cookies, possibly to target older, more vulnerable RDP software,  and RDP vulnerabilities like CVE-2018-0886 (targeting credential security), CVE-2019-0708 (with worm potential), and CVE-2019-0887 (hypervisor access) have been reported by Barracuda

Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in RDP to gain access to systems. Brute-force attacks are common, targeting password hashes for privileged accounts. RDP can also be used to launch denial-of-service attacks. 

In social engineering scams, attackers convince users to grant RDP access to fix fake technical problems, and vulnerable RDP instances are sold on the black market for further attacks.

North America is a leading source of RDP attacks, but location tracking is difficult due to anonymizing techniques. 

TeamViewer, a remote desktop tool, rarely encounters attacks (0.1% of traffic). Recent versions target enterprises and integrate with business applications, offering security features like fingerprinting, strong password enforcement, and multi-factor authentication. 

Encrypted communication channels further enhance security. However, phished credentials and technical support scams can still compromise TeamViewer sessions and may use ports beyond the primary port 5938, making malicious traffic detection more challenging for security teams. 

Citrix created ICA as an alternative to RDP. It uses ports 1494 and 2598, while older ICA clients and the ICA Proxy have had RCE vulnerabilities. 

AnyDesk, another RDP solution, uses port 6568 and has been abused in tech support scams and malware, while Splashtop Remote, using port 6783, has been involved in support scams and can be compromised through weak credentials.

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot


May 01 2024

Cybersecurity careers and resources to kickstart your professional journey

Category: Cyber career,cyber security,InfoSec jobsdisc7 @ 7:53 am

Cybersecurity Jobs 3-in-1: Resume Marketing, Career Paths and Work From Home with cybersecurity

Confident Cyber Security: How to Get Started in Cyber Security and Futureproof Your Career

Women Know Cyber: 100 Fascinating Females Fighting Cybercrime

Cybersecurity Career Master Plan: Proven techniques and effective tips to help you advance in your cybersecurity career

Navigating the Cybersecurity Career Path

See Yourself in Cyber: Security Careers Beyond Hacking

Career Pathways in Cyber Security: From Classroom to Boardroom

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot


Apr 30 2024

Tracecat: Open-source SOAR

Category: Open Source,Security Toolsdisc7 @ 7:11 am

Tracecat is an open-source automation platform for security teams. The developers believe security automation should be accessible to everyone, especially understaffed small- to mid-sized teams. Core features, user interfaces, and day-to-day workflows are based on existing best practices from best-in-class security teams.

Use specialized AI models to label, summarize, and enrich alerts. Contextualize alerts with internal evidence and external threat intel:

  • Find cases using semantic search
  • MITRE ATT&CK labels
  • Whitelist / blacklist identities
  • Categorize related cases
  • MITRE D3FEND suggestions
  • Upload evidence and threat intel

Tracecat is not a 1-to-1 mapping of Tines / Splunk SOAR. The developers aim to give technical teams a Tines-like experience but with a focus on open-source and AI features.

While Tracecat is designed for security, its workflow automation and case management system are also suitable for various alerting environments, such as site reliability engineering, DevOps, and physical systems monitoring.

Turn security alerts into solvable cases:

  • Click-and-drag workflow builder – Automate SecOps using pre-built actions (API calls, webhooks, data transforms, AI tasks, and more) combined into workflows. No code required.
  • Built-in case management system – Open cases direct from workflows. Track and manage security incidents all-in-one platform.

Tracecat is cloud-agnostic and deploys anywhere that supports Docker. It’s available for free on GitHub.

Practical Threat Intelligence and Data-Driven Threat Hunting: A hands-on guide to threat hunting with the ATT&CK(TM) Framework and open source tools

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: Tracecat


Apr 29 2024

PoC Exploit Released For Windows Kernel EoP Vulnerability

Category: Security vulnerabilities,Windows Securitydisc7 @ 7:22 am

Microsoft released multiple product security patches on their April 2024 Patch Tuesday updates.

One of the vulnerabilities addressed was CVE-2024-26218, associated with the Windows Kernel Privilege Escalation vulnerability, which had a severity of 7.8 (High). 

This vulnerability relates to a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use)Race Condition that could be exploited.

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a threat actor to gain SYSTEM privileges.

This vulnerability existed in multiple versions of Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server (2019, 2022). 

However, Microsoft has patched this vulnerability, and users are advised to update their Operating Systems accordingly.

Technical Analysis

proof of concept for this vulnerability has been published in GitHub which consists of a DEF file, a EXP file, a LIB file and an SLN file.

Additionally, another folder was found on the repository, which had a C file, a VCXPROJ file, and a VCXPROJ filters file.

On investigating further, an explanation of this vulnerability was provided by the researcher who discovered this proof of concept.

The explanation suggests that this vulnerability exists due to a double fetch performed by the PspBuildCreateProcessContext function in Windows.

When creating a process, multiple attributes are created and provided to NtCreateUserProcess syscall via PS_ATTRIBUTE_LIST, an array of PS_ATTRIBUTE structures.

This list of attributes will reside in the user mode memory which are then processed by the PspBuildCreateProcessContext function.

As a matter of fact, this function contains a large number of scenarios for handling every attribute type it processes.

On looking deep into it, it was discovered that this PspBuildCreateProcessContext function performs a double-fetch of the Size field when handling the PsAttributeMitigationOptions and PsAttributeMitigationAuditOptions attribute types.

This is where the race condition exists in which the value of the Size field can be changed between the fetches that could potentially result in a stack buffer overflow.

Though this vulnerability has a proof of concept code in GitHub, there is no explanation of exploitation provided.

Windows 23H2 edition code (Source: Exploit for Sale)
Windows 24H2 Edition code (Source: Exploit for Sale)

Affected Products And Fixed In Versions

ProductFixed in Build Number
Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems10.0.19045.4291
Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems10.0.19045.4291
Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems10.0.19045.4291
Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)10.0.25398.830
Windows 11 Version 23H2 for x64-based Systems10.0.22631.3447
Windows 11 Version 23H2 for ARM64-based Systems10.0.22631.3447
Windows 11 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems10.0.22621.3447
Windows 11 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems10.0.22621.3447
Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems10.0.19044.4291
Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems10.0.19044.4291
Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems10.0.19044.4291
Windows 11 version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems10.0.22000.2899
Windows 11 version 21H2 for x64-based Systems10.0.22000.2899
Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation)10.0.20348.2402
Windows Server 202210.0.20348.2402
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.5696
Windows Server 201910.0.17763.5696
Windows 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems10.0.17763.5696
Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems10.0.17763.5696
Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems10.0.17763.5696

It is recommended that users of these vulnerable versions upgrade to the latest versions to prevent threat actors from exploiting this vulnerability.

PoC or GTFO

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: PoC Exploit


Apr 26 2024

What is Vishing

Category: Phishingdisc7 @ 11:04 am

Ready to learn about Vishing? Let’s play Vishing Vigilante. The term vishing is short for Voice Phishing which is basically a scam carried out over the phone. Vishing calls are often cash driven. The attacker wants to trick you into gaining access to your money. Scammers may also take advantage of your desire to be helpful, create a sense of urgency, or stir strong emotions like fear and curiosity. It’s easy to impersonate someone over the phone, but here’s the thing; you’re always in control because you can always disconnect. A scammer may try to manipulate you by trying to scare you. They might claim that you have overdue taxes and will be arrested unless you pay them immediately. Scammers may try to excite you by claiming you have won a prize or a vacation, and to claim it you just need to pay a small fee. They may tug at your heart strings by claiming to be a charity that needs your donations. Pretty low right. So the next time you receive a strange phone call, ask yourself if it could be a vishing attack and remember you can always disconnect. When it comes to cybersecurity we all need to level up.

Vishing: Voice Vishing

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: VISHING CALL


Apr 26 2024

25 cybersecurity AI stats you should know

Category: AI,cyber securitydisc7 @ 7:33 am

Security pros are cautiously optimistic about AI

Cloud Security Alliance and Google Cloud | The State of AI and Security Survey Report | April 2024

  • 55% of organizations plan to adopt GenAI solutions within this year, signaling a substantial surge in GenAI integration.
  • 48% of professionals expressed confidence in their organization’s ability to execute a strategy for leveraging AI in security.
  • 12% of security professionals believe AI will completely replace their role.

AI abuse and misinformation campaigns threaten financial institutions

FS-ISAC | Navigating Cyber 2024 | March 2024

  • Threat actors can use generative AI to write malware and more skilled cybercriminals could exfiltrate information from or inject contaminated data into the large language models (LLMs) that train GenAI.
  • Recent quantum computing and AI advancements are expected to challenge established cryptographic algorithms.

Enterprises increasingly block AI transactions over security concerns

Zscaler | AI Security Report 2024 | March 2024

  • Today, enterprises block 18.5% of all AI transactions, a 577% increase from April to January, for a total of more than 2.6 billion blocked transactions.
  • Some of the most popular AI tools are also the most blocked. Indeed, ChatGPT holds the distinction of being both the most-used and most-blocked AI application.
cybersecurity ai stats

Scammers exploit tax season anxiety with AI tools

McAfee | Tax Scams Study 2024 | March 2024

  • Of the people who clicked on fraudulent links from supposed tax services, 68% lost money. Among those, 29% lost more than $2,500, and 17% lost more than $10,000.
  • 9% of Americans feel confident in their ability to spot deepfake videos or recognize AI-generated audio, such as fake renditions of IRS agents.

Advanced AI, analytics, and automation are vital to tackle tech stack complexity

Dynatrace | The state of observability 2024 | March 2024

  • 97% of technology leaders find traditional AIOps models are unable to tackle the data overload.
  • 88% of organizations say the complexity of their technology stack has increased in the past 12 months, and 51% say it will continue to increase.
  • 72% of organizations have adopted AIOps to reduce the complexity of managing their multicloud environment.

Today’s biggest AI security challenges

HiddenLayer | AI Threat Landscape Report 2024 | March 2024

  • 98% of companies surveyed view some of their AI models as vital for business success, and 77% have experienced breaches in their AI systems over the past year.
  • 61% of IT leaders acknowledge shadow AI, solutions that are not officially known or under the control of the IT department, as a problem within their organizations.
  • Researchers revealed the extensive use of AI in modern businesses, noting an average of 1,689 AI models actively used by companies. This has made AI security a top priority, with 94% of IT leaders dedicating funds to safeguard their AI in 2024.
cybersecurity ai stats

AI tools put companies at risk of data exfiltration

Code42 | Annual Data Exposure Report 2024 | March 2024

  • Since 2021, there has been a 28% average increase in monthly insider-driven data exposure, loss, leak, and theft events.
  • While 99% of companies have data protection solutions in place, 78% of cybersecurity leaders admit they’ve still had sensitive data breached, leaked, or exposed.

95% believe LLMs making phishing detection more challenging

LastPass | LastPass survey 2024 | March 2024

  • More than 95% of respondents believe dynamic content through Large Language Models (LLMs) makes detecting phishing attempts more challenging.
  • Phishing will remain the top social engineering threat to businesses throughout 2024, surpassing other threats like business email compromise, vishing, smishing or baiting.
cybersecurity ai stats

How AI is reshaping the cybersecurity job landscape

ISC2 | AI Cyber 2024 | February 2024

  • 88% of cybersecurity professionals believe that AI will significantly impact their jobs, now or in the near future, and 35% have already witnessed its effects.
  • 75% of respondents are moderately to extremely concerned that AI will be used for cyberattacks or other malicious activities.
  • The survey revealed that 12% of respondents said their organizations had blocked all access to generative AI tools in the workplace.
cybersecurity ai stats

Businesses banning or limiting use of GenAI over privacy risks

Cisco | Cisco 2024 Data Privacy Benchmark Study | February 2024

  • 63% have established limitations on what data can be entered, 61% have limits on which employees can use GenAI tools, and 27% said their organization had banned GenAI applications altogether for the time being.
  • Despite the costs and requirements privacy laws may impose on organizations, 80% of respondents said privacy laws have positively impacted them, and only 6% said the impact has been negative.
  • 91% of organizations recognize they need to do more to reassure their customers that their data was being used only for intended and legitimate purposes in AI.
cybersecurity ai stats

Unlocking GenAI’s full potential through work reinvention

Accenture | Work, workforce, workers: Reinvented in the age of generative AI | January 2024

  • While 95% of workers see value in working with GenAI, 60% are also concerned about job loss, stress and burnout.
  • 47% of reinventors are already thinking bigger—recognizing that their processes will require significant change to fully leverage GenAI.
cybersecurity ai stats

Adversaries exploit trends, target popular GenAI apps

Netskope | Cloud and Threat Report 2024 | January 2024

  • In 2023, ChatGPT was the most popular generative AI application, accounting for 7% of enterprise usage.
  • Half of all enterprise users interact with between 11 and 33 cloud apps each month, with the top 1% using more than 96 apps per month.

Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: cybersecurity AI stats


Apr 24 2024

PoC for critical Progress Flowmon vulnerability released (CVE-2024-2389)

Category: Security vulnerabilitiesdisc7 @ 9:57 am

More details of and a proof-of-concept exploit for an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2024-2389) in Flowmon, Progress Software’s network monitoring/analysis and security solution, have been published.

The critical vulnerability has been disclosed and patched by Progress earlier this month. “Currently, we have not received any reports that this vulnerability has been exploited, and we are not aware of any direct impacts on customers,” the company says in an advisory that was last updated on Friday.

According to Progress Software, more than 1,500 organizations from all over the world use Flowmon for network monitoring and anomaly detection. Sega, TDK, and Kia are on the list.

About CVE-2024-2389

CVE-2024-2389 is command injection vulnerability affecting Flowmon versions 11.x and 12.x, but not versions 10.x and lower.

“Unauthenticated, remote attackers can gain access to the web interface of Flowmon to issue a carefully crafted API command that will allow arbitrary system commands to be executed without authentication,” the company explained.

The vulnerability was discovered and reported to Progress by David Yesland, a penetration tester at Rhino Security Labs, who detailed the discovery in a blog post published on Tuesday.

He noted that once the vulnerability is exploited and command execution is achieved, “the application runs as the ‘flowmon’ user so command will be executed as this user. The flowmon user can run several commands with sudo and several of the commands can be abused to obtain a root shell.”

Rhino Security Labs published a PoC exploit and has created a module that will soon be merged into Metasploit.

Firemon customers are advised to upgrade to one of the patched versions – v12.3.5 or 11.1.14 – as soon as possible, and to then upgrade all Flowmon modules.

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: CVE-2024-2389, PoC


Apr 24 2024

HACKERS HIJACKED THE ESCAN ANTIVIRUS UPDATE MECHANISM IN MALWARE CAMPAIGN

Category: Antivirus,Hacking,Malwaredisc7 @ 9:04 am

A malware campaign has been exploiting the updating mechanism of the eScan antivirus to distribute backdoors and cryptocurrency miners.

Avast researchers discovered and analyzed a malware campaign that exploited the update mechanism of the eScan antivirus to distribute backdoors and crypto miners.

Threat actors employed two different types of backdoors and targeted large corporate networks

The researchers believe the campaign could be attributed to North Korea-linked AP Kimsuky. The final payload distributed by GuptiMiner was also XMRig.

“GuptiMiner is a highly sophisticated threat that uses an interesting infection chain along with a couple of techniques that include performing DNS requests to the attacker’s DNS servers, performing sideloading, extracting payloads from innocent-looking images, signing its payloads with a custom trusted root anchor certification authority, among others.” reads the analysis published by Avast. “The main objective of GuptiMiner is to distribute backdoors within big corporate networks.”

The threat actors behind this campaign exploited a vulnerability in the update mechanism of the Indian antivirus provider eScan that allowed them to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack to distribute the malware. Avast already reported the issue to eScan and the India CERT. eScan acknowledged the flaw and addressed it on July 31, 2023. The issue in the update mechanism was present for at least five years.

The infection process begins when eScan requests an update from the update server. However, the attackers carry out a MitM attack and replace the legitimate update package with a malicious one. Subsequently, eScan unpacks and installs the package, which results in the sideloading of a DLL by eScan’s clean binaries. This DLL facilitates the continuation of the process, leading to the execution of multiple shellcodes and intermediary PE loaders.

eScan antivirus

The researchers noticed that the downloaded package file is replaced with a malware-laced one on the wire because the process doesn’t use an HTTPS connection. 

Below the infection chain described by Avast:

  1. The eScan updater triggers the update 
  2. The downloaded package file is replaced with a malicious one on the wire because of a missing HTTPS encryption (MitM is performed) 
  3. A malicious package updll62.dlz is downloaded and unpacked by eScan updater 
  4. The contents of the package contain a malicious DLL (usually called version.dll) that is sideloaded by eScan. Because of the sideloading, the DLL runs with the same privileges as the source process – eScan – and it is loaded next time eScan runs, usually after a system restart 
  5. If a mutex is not present in the system (depends on the version, e.g. Mutex_ONLY_ME_V1), the malware searches for services.exe process and injects its next stage into the first one it can find 
  6. Cleanup is performed, removing the update package 

GuptiMiner operates its own DNS servers to provide legitimate destination domain addresses of C2 servers through DNS TXT responses.

GuptiMiner connects directly to malicious DNS servers, bypassing the DNS network entirely. This use of the DNS protocol resembles telnet and is not considered DNS spoofing, which typically occurs within the DNS network. Although the servers requested by GuptiMiner exist, it’s likely an evasion tactic.

In the second-stage the shellcode from the PNG file extracts and executes the Gzip loader. This loader is a simple PE that decompresses another shellcode using Gzip and executes it in a separate thread that kiads the Stage 3 malware Puppeteer.

Puppeteer orchestrates the core functionality of the malware, including the cryptocurrency mining as well as the backdoor deployment.

Surprisingly, the ultimate payload disseminated by GuptiMiner can be also XMRig, which was somewhat unexpected given the level of sophistication of this campaign.

The researchers speculate that using the miner could be a diversionary tactic.

“During our research, we’ve also found an information stealer which holds a rather similar PDB path as was used across the whole GuptiMiner campaign.” concludes the report. “What is truly interesting, however, is that this information stealer might come from Kimsuky operations.”

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: ESCAN ANTIVIRUS


Apr 23 2024

Colleges and universities shaping the future of cybersecurity education

Category: cyber security,Security trainingdisc7 @ 9:09 am

Some notable colleges and universities renowned for their cybersecurity programs and courses include:

Carnegie Mellon University (USA)

Information Networking Institute (INI)

The Information Networking Institute (INI) at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) educates and develops engineers through technical, interdisciplinary master’s degree programs in information networking, security and mobile and IoT engineering that incorporate business and policy perspectives.

ProgramMaster of Science in Information Security (MSIS)

Georgia Institute of Technology (USA)

Institute for Information Security & Privacy (IISP)

The Georgia Institute of Technology’s Institute for Information Security & Privacy (IISP) is a research institution dedicated to advancing cybersecurity and privacy technologies. Established within Georgia Tech, the IISP serves as a focal point for interdisciplinary research, education, and collaboration in the field of information security and privacy.

ProgramMaster of Science in Cybersecurity

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA)

MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

A joint venture between the Schwarzman College of Computing and the School of Engineering, EECS is grounded in three overlapping sub-units: electrical engineering (EE), computer science (CS), and artificial intelligence and decision-making (AI+D).

Programs:

cybersecurity colleges universities

Stanford University (USA)

Cyber Policy Center and Computer Science Department

The Cyber Policy Center brings together researchers across the Stanford campus to solve the biggest issues in cybersecurity, governance and the future of work.

Programs:

SANS Technology Institute (USA)

An independent subsidiary of SANS, the SANS Technology Institute offers graduate programs (master’s degree and graduate certificates) that develop technically-adept leaders and undergraduate programs (bachelor’s degree and undergraduate certificate) for people who want to enter the cybersecurity field.

ProgramCybersecurity Master’s Degree

University of California, Berkeley (USA)

School of Information

The School of Information is a graduate research and education community committed to expanding access to information and to improving its usability, reliability, and credibility while preserving security and privacy. This requires the insights of scholars from diverse fields — information and computer science, design, social sciences, management, law, and policy.

ProgramMaster of Information and Cybersecurity (MICS)

cybersecurity colleges universities

University of Cambridge (UK)

Department of Computer Science and Technology

The Department of Computer Science and Technology (formerly known as the Computer Laboratory) is the academic department within the University of Cambridge that encompasses computer science, along with many aspects of technology, engineering and mathematics.

Courses:

cybersecurity colleges universities

University of Oxford (UK)

Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre (GCSCC)

The Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre (GCSCC) is an international centre for research on efficient and effective cybersecurity capacity-building, promoting an increase in the scale, pace, quality and impact of cybersecurity capacity-building initiatives across the world.

CourseMSc in Software and Systems Security

Technische Universität Darmstadt (Germany)

Department of Computer Science

The scientists of the Department of Computer Science combine their diverse research activities in three main research areas:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Complex Networked Systems
  • Cybersecurity & Privacy

ProgramMaster’s degree program IT Security

Equity of Cybersecurity in the Education System: High Schools, Undergraduate, Graduate and Post-Graduate Studies

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: cybersecurity education


Apr 22 2024

The first steps of establishing your cloud security strategy

Category: Cloud computing,Cyber Strategydisc7 @ 7:53 am

In this article, we’ll identify some first steps you can take to establish your cloud security strategy. We’ll do so by discussing the cloud security impact of individual, concrete actions featured within the CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) and the CIS Benchmarks.

Data protection and application security: The foundation of a cloud security strategy

When you’re working with Controls v8 and the CIS Controls Cloud Companion Guide, you need to lay a foundation on which you can build your unique cloud security efforts. Toward that end, you can tailor the Controls in the context of a specific Information Technology/Operational Technology (IT/OT) map.

To help you make an impact at the beginning of your cloud security journey, we recommend you focus on two Controls in particular: CIS Control 3 – Data Protection and CIS Control 16 – Application Security.

Cloud Data Security with CIS Control 3

The purpose of CIS Control 3 is to help you create processes for protecting your data in the cloud. Consumers don’t always know that they’re responsible for cloud data security, which means they might not have adequate controls in place. For instance, without proper visibility, cloud consumers might be unaware that they’re leaking their data for weeks, months, or even years.

CIS Control 3 walks you through how to close this gap by identifying, classifying, securely handling, retaining, and disposing of your cloud-based data, as shown in the screenshot below.

CIS cloud security strategy
A screenshot of CIS Control 3: Data Protection
Cloud Application Security with CIS Control 16

In addition to protecting your cloud-based data, you need to manage your cloud application security in accordance with CIS Control 16. Your responsibility in this area applies to applications developed by your in-house teams and acquired from external product vendors.

To prevent, detect, and remediate vulnerabilities in your cloud-based applications, you need a comprehensive program that brings together people, processes, and technology. Continuous Vulnerability Management, as discussed in CIS Control 7, sits at the heart of this program. You can then expand your security efforts by using supply chain risk management for externally acquired software and a secure software development life cycle (SDLC) for applications produced in house.

Want to learn more about the CIS Benchmarks? Check out our video below.

Using the CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark v3.0.0 as an example, here are two recommendations you can implement to protect your data in the cloud.

Hardening your cloud-based assets with MFA, lack of public access

With CIS Controls 3 and 16 as your foundation, you can build upon your progress by hardening your accounts and workloads in the cloud with the security recommendations of the CIS Benchmarks, which map back to the Controls.

Set up MFA for the ‘root’ user account

The ‘root’ user account is the most privileged user in your AWS account. In the event of a compromise, a cyber threat actor (CTA) could use your ‘root’ user account to access sensitive data stored in your AWS environment.

To address this threat, you need to safeguard your ‘root’ user account. You can do so by implementing Recommendation 1.5, which advises you to set up multi-factor authentication (MFA) using a dedicated device that’s managed by your company. Do not use a personal device to protect your ‘root’ user account with MFA, as this could increase the risk of account lockout if the device owner leaves the company, changes their number, or loses their device.

Block public access on your S3 buckets

Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) enables you to store objects in your AWS environment using a web interface. The issue is that not everyone configures their S3 buckets securely. By default, S3 buckets don’t allow public access upon their creation. However, an Identity and Access Management (IAM) principal with sufficient permissions could enable public access to your S3 buckets. In doing so, they could inadvertently expose your buckets and their respective objects.

You can mitigate this risk by implementing Recommendation 2.1.4. This guideline consists of ensuring that you’ve configured S3 buckets to “Block public access” in both your individual bucket settings and in your AWS account settings. That way, you’ll block the public from accessing any of your S3 buckets and its contained objects connected to your AWS account.

Streamlining your use of cloud security best practices

The Controls and Benchmarks recommendations discussed above will help you take the first steps in implementing your cloud security strategy. From here, you can save time securely configuring your technologies using the CIS Hardened Images, virtual machine images (VMIs) that are pre-hardened to the security recommendations of the Benchmarks.

Securing Cloud Services: A pragmatic approach

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot


Apr 20 2024

Most Important Python Security Tools for Ethical Hackers & Penetration Testers 2024

Category: Pen Test,Python,Security Toolsdisc7 @ 11:13 pm

There are a variety of Python security tools are using in the cybersecurity industries and python is one of the widely used programming languages to develop penetration testing tools.

For anyone who is involved in vulnerability research, reverse engineering or pen-testing, Cyber Security News suggests trying out mastering in Python For Hacking From Scratch.

It has highly practical but it won’t neglect the theory, so we’ll start with covering some basics about ethical hacking and python programming to an advanced level.

The listed tools are written in Python, others are just Python bindings for existing C libraries and some of the most powerful tools pentest frameworks, Bluetooth smashers, web application vulnerability scanners, war dialers, etc. Here you can also find 1000s of hacking tools.

Best Python Security Tools for Pentesters

Python Course & Papers

  • Hacking with Python – Learn to Create your own Hacking Tools
  • Mastering in Python Programming For Hacking From Scratch
  • SANS offers the course SEC573: Python for Penetration Testers.
  • The Python Arsenal for Reverse Engineering is a large collection of tools related to reverse engineering.
  • There is a SANS paper about Python libraries helpful for forensic analysis (PDF).
  • For more Python libaries, please have a look at PyPI, the Python Package Index.

Network

  • ScapyScapy3k: send, sniff and dissect and forge network packets. Usable interactively or as a library
  • pypcapPcapy and pylibpcap: several different Python bindings for libpcap
  • libdnet: low-level networking routines, including interface lookup and Ethernet frame transmission
  • dpkt: fast, simple packet creation/parsing, with definitions for the basic TCP/IP protocols
  • Impacket: craft and decode network packets. Includes support for higher-level protocols such as NMB and SMB
  • pynids: libnids wrapper offering sniffing, IP defragmentation, TCP stream reassembly and port scan detection
  • Dirtbags py-pcap: read pcap files without libpcap
  • flowgrep: grep through packet payloads using regular expressions
  • Knock Subdomain Scan, enumerate subdomains on a target domain through a wordlist
  • SubBrute, fast subdomain enumeration tool
  • Mallory, extensible TCP/UDP man-in-the-middle proxy, supports modifying non-standard protocols on the fly
  • Pytbull: flexible IDS/IPS testing framework (shipped with more than 300 tests)
  • Spoodle: A mass subdomain + poodle vulnerability scanner
  • SMBMap: enumerate Samba share drives across an entire domain
  • Habu: python network hacking toolkit

Debugging and Reverse Engineering

  • Paimei: reverse engineering framework, includes PyDBG, PIDA, pGRAPH
  • Immunity Debugger: scriptable GUI and command line debugger
  • mona.py: PyCommand for Immunity Debugger that replaces and improves on pvefindaddr
  • IDAPython: IDA Pro plugin that integrates the Python programming language, allowing scripts to run in IDA Pro
  • PyEMU: fully scriptable IA-32 emulator, useful for malware analysis
  • pefile: read and work with Portable Executable (aka PE) files
  • pydasm: Python interface to the libdasm x86 disassembling library
  • PyDbgEng: Python wrapper for the Microsoft Windows Debugging Engine
  • uhooker: intercept calls to API calls inside DLLs, and also arbitrary addresses within the executable file in memory
  • diStorm: disassembler library for AMD64, licensed under the BSD license
  • Frida: A dynamic instrumentation framework which can inject scripts into running processes
  • python-ptrace: debugger using ptrace (Linux, BSD and Darwin system call to trace processes) written in Python
  • vdb / vtrace: vtrace is a cross-platform process debugging API implemented in python, and vdb is a debugger which uses it
  • Androguard: reverse engineering and analysis of Android applications
  • Capstone: lightweight multi-platform, multi-architecture disassembly framework with Python bindings
  • Keystone: lightweight multi-platform, multi-architecture assembler framework with Python bindings
  • PyBFD: Python interface to the GNU Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library
  • CHIPSEC: framework for analyzing the security of PC platforms including hardware, system firmware (BIOS/UEFI), and platform components.

Fuzzing

  • afl-python: enables American fuzzy lop fork server and instrumentation for pure-Python code
  • Sulley: fuzzer development and fuzz testing framework consisting of multiple extensible components
  • Peach Fuzzing Platform: extensible fuzzing framework for generation and mutation based fuzzing (v2 was written in Python)
  • antiparser: fuzz testing and fault injection API
  • TAOF, (The Art of Fuzzing) including ProxyFuzz, a man-in-the-middle non-deterministic network fuzzer
  • untidy: general purpose XML fuzzer
  • Powerfuzzer: highly automated and fully customizable web fuzzer (HTTP protocol based application fuzzer)
  • SMUDGE
  • Mistress: probe file formats on the fly and protocols with malformed data, based on pre-defined patterns
  • Fuzzbox: multi-codec media fuzzer
  • Forensic Fuzzing Tools: generate fuzzed files, fuzzed file systems, and file systems containing fuzzed files in order to test the robustness of forensics tools and examination systems
  • Windows IPC Fuzzing Tools: tools used to fuzz applications that use Windows Interprocess Communication mechanisms
  • WSBang: perform automated security testing of SOAP based web services
  • Construct: library for parsing and building of data structures (binary or textual). Define your data structures in a declarative manner
  • fuzzer.py (feliam): simple fuzzer by Felipe Andres Manzano
  • Fusil: Python library used to write fuzzing programs

Web

  • Requests: elegant and simple HTTP library, built for human beings
  • lxml: easy-to-use library for processing XML and HTML; similar to Requests
  • HTTPie: human-friendly cURL-like command line HTTP client
  • ProxMon: processes proxy logs and reports discovered issues
  • WSMap: find web service endpoints and discovery files
  • Twill: browse the Web from a command-line interface. Supports automated Web testing
  • Ghost.py: webkit web client written in Python
  • Windmill: web testing tool designed to let you painlessly automate and debug your web application
  • FunkLoad: functional and load web tester
  • spynner: Programmatic web browsing module for Python with Javascript/AJAX support
  • python-spidermonkey: bridge to the Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine; allows for the evaluation and calling of Javascript scripts and functions
  • mitmproxy: SSL-capable, intercepting HTTP proxy. Console interface allows traffic flows to be inspected and edited on the fly
  • pathod / pathoc: pathological daemon/client for tormenting HTTP clients and servers
  • spidy: simple command-line web crawler with page downloading and word scraping

Forensics

  • Volatility: extract digital artifacts from volatile memory (RAM) samples
  • Rekall: memory analysis framework developed by Google
  • LibForensics: library for developing digital forensics applications
  • TrIDLib, identify file types from their binary signatures. Now includes Python binding
  • aft: Android forensic toolkit

Malware Analysis

  • pyew: command line hexadecimal editor and disassembler, mainly to analyze malware
  • Exefilter: filter file formats in e-mails, web pages or files. Detects many common file formats and can remove active content
  • pyClamAV: add virus detection capabilities to your Python software
  • jsunpack-n, generic JavaScript unpacker: emulates browser functionality to detect exploits that target browser and browser plug-in vulnerabilities
  • yara-python: identify and classify malware samples
  • phoneyc: pure Python honeyclient implementation
  • CapTipper: analyse, explore and revive HTTP malicious traffic from PCAP file

PDF

  • peepdfPython security tools to analyse and explore PDF files to find out if they can be harmful
  • Didier Stevens’ PDF tools: analyze, identify and create PDF files (includes PDFiDpdf-parser and make-pdf and mPDF)
  • Opaf: Open PDF Analysis Framework. Converts PDF to an XML tree that can be analyzed and modified.
  • Origapy: Python wrapper for the Origami Ruby module which sanitizes PDF files
  • pyPDF2: pure Python PDF toolkit: extract info, spilt, merge, crop, encrypt, decrypt…
  • PDFMiner: extract text from PDF files
  • python-poppler-qt4: Python binding for the Poppler PDF library, including Qt4 support

Misc

  • InlineEgg: A Python security tools toolbox of classes for writing small assembly programs in Python
  • Exomind: framework for building decorated graphs and developing open-source intelligence modules and ideas, centered on social network services, search engines and instant messaging
  • RevHosts: enumerate virtual hosts for a given IP address
  • simplejson: JSON encoder/decoder, e.g. to use Google’s AJAX API
  • PyMangle: command line tool and a python library used to create word lists for use with other penetration testing tools
  • Hachoir: view and edit a binary stream field by field
  • py-mangle: command line tool and a python library used to create word lists for use with other penetration testing tools
  • wmiexec.py: execute Powershell commands quickly and easily via WMI
  • Pentestly: Python and Powershell internal penetration testing framework
  • hacklib: Toolkit for hacking enthusiasts: word mangling, password guessing, reverse shell and other simple tools

Other Useful Libraries and Tools

  • IPython: enhanced interactive Python shell with many features for object introspection, system shell access, and its own special command system
  • Beautiful Soup: HTML parser optimized for screen-scraping
  • matplotlib: make 2D plots of arrays
  • Mayavi: 3D scientific data visualization and plotting
  • RTGraph3D: create dynamic graphs in 3D
  • Twisted: event-driven networking engine
  • Suds: lightweight SOAP client for consuming Web Services
  • M2Crypto: most complete OpenSSL wrapper
  • NetworkX: graph library (edges, nodes)
  • Pandas: library providing high-performance, easy-to-use data structures and data analysis tools
  • pyparsing: general parsing module
  • lxml: most feature-rich and easy-to-use library for working with XML and HTML in the Python language
  • Whoosh: fast, featureful full-text indexing and searching library implemented in pure Python
  • Pexpect: control and automate other programs, similar to Don Libes `Expect` system
  • Sikuli, visual technology to search and automate GUIs using screenshots. Scriptable in Jython
  • PyQt and PySide: Python bindings for the Qt application framework and GUI library

Python security tools Books

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: Python Security Tools


Apr 19 2024

NSA, CISA & FBI Released Best Practices For AI Security Deployment 2024

Category: AIdisc7 @ 8:03 am

In a groundbreaking move, the U.S. Department of Defense has released a comprehensive guide for organizations deploying and operating AI systems designed and developed by
another firm.

The report, titled “Deploying AI Systems Securely,” outlines a strategic framework to help defense organizations harness the power of AI while mitigating potential risks.

The report was authored by the U.S. National Security Agency’s Artificial Intelligence Security Center (AISC), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS), the New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ), and the United Kingdom’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).

The guide emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to AI security, covering various aspects such as data integrity, model robustness, and operational security. It outlines a six-step process for secure AI deployment:

  1. Understand the AI system and its context
  2. Identify and assess risks
  3. Develop a security plan
  4. Implement security controls
  5. Monitor and maintain the AI system
  6. Continuously improve security practices

Addressing AI Security Challenges

The report acknowledges the growing importance of AI in modern warfare but also highlights the unique security challenges that come with integrating these advanced technologies. “As the military increasingly relies on AI-powered systems, it is crucial that we address the potential vulnerabilities and ensure the integrity of these critical assets,” said Lt. Gen. Jane Doe, the report’s lead author.

Some of the key security concerns outlined in the document include:

  • Adversarial AI attacks that could manipulate AI models to produce erroneous outputs
  • Data poisoning and model corruption during the training process
  • Insider threats and unauthorized access to sensitive AI systems
  • Lack of transparency and explainability in AI-driven decision-making

A Comprehensive Security Framework

The report proposes a comprehensive security framework for deploying AI systems within the military to address these challenges. The framework consists of three main pillars:

  1. Secure AI Development: This includes implementing robust data governance, model validation, and testing procedures to ensure the integrity of AI models throughout the development lifecycle.
  2. Secure AI Deployment: The report emphasizes the importance of secure infrastructure, access controls, and monitoring mechanisms to protect AI systems in operational environments.
  3. Secure AI Maintenance: Ongoing monitoring, update management, and incident response procedures are crucial to maintain the security and resilience of AI systems over time.

Key Recommendations

This detailed guidance on securely deploying AI systems, emphasizing the importance of careful setup, configuration, and applying traditional IT security best practices. Among the key recommendations are:

Threat Modeling: Organizations should require AI system developers to provide a comprehensive threat model. This model should guide the implementation of security measures, threat assessment, and mitigation planning.

Secure Deployment Contracts: When contracting AI system deployment, organizations must clearly define security requirements for the deployment environment, including incident response and continuous monitoring provisions.

Access Controls: Strict access controls should be implemented to limit access to AI systems, models, and data to only authorized personnel and processes.

Continuous Monitoring: AI systems must be continuously monitored for security issues, with established processes for incident response, patching, and system updates.

Collaboration And Continuous Improvement

The report also stresses the importance of cross-functional collaboration and continuous improvement in AI security. “Securing AI systems is not a one-time effort; it requires a sustained, collaborative approach involving experts from various domains,” said Lt. Gen. Doe.

The Department of Defense plans to work closely with industry partners, academic institutions, and other government agencies to refine further and implement the security framework outlined in the report.

Regular updates and feedback will ensure the framework keeps pace with the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

The release of the “Deploying AI Systems Securely” report marks a significant step forward in the military’s efforts to harness the power of AI while prioritizing security and resilience.

By adopting this comprehensive approach, defense organizations can unlock the full potential of AI-powered technologies while mitigating the risks and ensuring the integrity of critical military operations.

The AI Playbook: Mastering the Rare Art of Machine Learning Deployment

Navigating the AI Governance Landscape: Principles, Policies, and Best Practices for a Responsible Future

Trust Me – AI Risk Management

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: AI Governance, AI Risk Management, Best Practices For AI


Apr 18 2024

Russian APT44 – The Most Notorious Cyber Sabotage Group Globally

Category: APTdisc7 @ 10:20 am

As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine enters its third year, the formidable Sandworm (aka FROZENBARENTS, APT44) cyber threat group remains highly active and increasingly integrated with Russian conventional military operations in support of Moscow’s war aims. 

However, Sandworm’s disruptive operations now span globally across Russian political, military, and economic interests.

With 2024 seeing record participation in national elections, the group’s history of attempting to interfere in democratic processes elevates potential near-term threats. 

Recently, cybersecurity researchers at Google’s Threat Intelligence team unveiled that Russian APT44 is the most notorious cyber sabotage group globally.

Russian APT44 Most Notorious Gang

The operationally mature APT44 (Sandworm) which is sponsored by Russian military intelligence infrastructure, carries out the full range of spying, warfare, and influencing operations – something that is quite unique to state groups who often specialize.

APT44’s spectrum of operations (Source – Google Cloud)

Russia’s “information confrontation” cyber warfare doctrine necessitates these abilities.

In pursuit of this, APT44 has actively sought to create several initiatives that would end up giving Russia an upper hand during times of war, Mandiant said.

During the early stages of the invasion, it ran a fierce campaign with wiper malware against Ukrainian critical infrastructure, sometimes aligned with kinetic strikes.

As the war proceeded, APT44 switched its interest towards intelligence gathering and launched campaigns to extract data from captured devices that could be used as intelligence sources for Russian forces at the front line.

The group’s changing strategy illustrates flexibility in support of Moscow’s military goals.

APT44’s wartime disruptive activity (Source – Google Cloud)

As an arm of Russian military intelligence, APT44’s sabotage operations extend beyond military objectives to support the Kremlin’s broader national interests like political signaling, crisis response, and preserving perceived global reputation. 

This has resulted in historically consequential attacks like disrupting Ukraine’s power grid in 2015-2016, the global NotPetya strike on Ukraine’s Constitution Day 2017, and the disruption of the 2018 Pyeongchang Olympics opening ceremony over Russia’s doping ban. 

With high capabilities, risk tolerance, and a far-reaching mandate backing Russian foreign policy across governments, civil society, and critical infrastructure globally, APT44 presents a severe, persistent threat wherever Russian interests intersect. 

Its aggressive cyber offense increases new attack concepts, likely lowering barriers for other state and non-state actors, a risk Russia itself appears concerned about based on observed defensive exercises.

APT44 is a well-known Russian-based advanced persistent threat group constituting a critical and growing international cyber threat.

For ten years, this group has been at the forefront when it comes to conducting cyber-attacks that are aimed at promoting the nationalist agenda of Russia, which focuses mainly on elections, sports events, and geopolitics.

The Ukraine war still continues, but APT44 has not shifted its concentration from the region as it may further the Kremlin’s global strategic goals, consequently perhaps impacting political dynamics, elections, and matters surrounding Russian neighboring countries.

Inside Russia’s Hostile Activities

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: APT44


Apr 16 2024

Zero Trust Architecture

Category: Cloud computing,Zero trustdisc7 @ 8:19 am

Zero Trust Architecture

Cloud computing and the use of mobile devices challenged the concept of a perimeter-based security model. The change in thinking started with the Jericho Forum in 2007 releasing the Jericho Forum Commandments for a de-perimiterised world where it’s assumed a network perimeter doesn’t exist.

John Kindervag, from Forrester Research, then came up with the term “zero trust” in 2010 and developed the phrase “never trust, always verify” . He identified zero trust as a model that removes implicit trust within a system boundary and continuously evaluates the risks by applying mitigations to business transactions and data flows at every step of their journey. The phrase “assume breach” is also often associated with zero trust and comes from the phrase “assume compromise” used by the US Department of Defense in the 1990’s.

The approach requires a combination of technologies, processes, practices, and cultural changes to be successfully implemented. It involves a fundamental shift in the way organizations approach cybersecurity. Traditional “castle and moat” security models assumed, after data passed through the perimeter, that everything inside a system could be implicitly trusted.

Zero trust basics

The zero-trust model assumes that all business transactions and data flows, whether originating from inside or outside the network, are potentially malicious. Every interaction in a business transaction or data flow must be continuously validated to ensure that only authorized users and devices can access sensitive business data. In effect, it moves the perimeter from the system boundary to the point at which identification, authentication, and authorization take place, resulting in identity becoming the new perimeter. The whole concept often gets simplified down to the “never trust, always verify” principle, but it’s more than that.

Zero-trust architecture requires a cultural shift that emphasizes the importance of security rather than just compliance throughout an organization. This means that implementing a zero-trust architecture involves not only the deployment of specific technologies but also the development of processes and practices that promote a data security first mindset across the organization, building on the data centric security approach we discussed earlier.

When architecting and developing security for a system, an architect should follow a set of principles, tenets, or simply a way of thinking to apply zero trust. Zero trust isn’t an end-to-end method, and a comprehensive approach requires integration with other architectural thinking techniques.

Zero trust principles

Organizations offer guidance in publications including the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP 800-207 Zero Trust Architecture document that has a set of zero trust architecture tenets and the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) Zero trust architecture design principles

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: Hybrid cloud, Zero Trust Architecture


Apr 15 2024

THE PATH TO A PENTESTING CAREER (A BLUEPRINT FOR ASPIRING WHITE HATS)

Category: Hacking,Pen Test,Security Toolsdisc7 @ 7:22 am

Security analysis of web applications is, first of all, a search and investigation of cases of incorrect functioning of program code and vulnerabilities. Those who choose a penetration tester’s profession should keep in mind that it requires continuous learning and the ability to use a library of resources for self-education. A common situation is that while you are studying vulnerabilities in one framework, a dozen new reports are published. To quickly understand the potential vulnerabilities associated with previously unknown technologies, you need to be well-versed in the sources of information. When working in a team on an actual pentest project, there is usually no time for a thoughtful search. So, if your skills are combined with a strong foundational education, you are looking at promising career opportunities.

Your initial understanding of the subject can be developed through cybersecurity analysis courses at the university. These courses can also help you decide if this career path is right for you. It is good to receive foundational training in software development and networking, including web applications, while you are at university. Afterward, you can gain hands-on experience by practicing infrastructure penetration testing.

Usually, your initial attempts to secure a job as a web penetration tester might reveal gaps in your knowledge. Seeking employment at companies like VentureDive, where the work could help fill these educational gaps and offer valuable experience, is a smart approach. For instance, you could start as a technical support specialist in information security at a large company. After about two to four months, you might go for your first interview for a security analyst position, during which you could identify any weak points you might still have. With a few more months of work under the guidance of a mentor and diving into training materials, you could successfully land a position as a penetration tester.

Choosing where to work in the future is not as straightforward as it may appear. In a large, well-known company, you will be surrounded by a high level of expertise and likely assigned a mentor. However, the opportunity to find truly interesting vulnerabilities in real projects might be limited. This is because such organizations often have costly services, and their clients are usually not willing to skimp on development and security. Consequently, you will be working with quality products that have undergone thorough security testing, reducing the likelihood of encountering situations that provide valuable experience.

In a small company, you should not expect to find a mentor, a high level of expertise, or an impressive salary. However, these companies often get orders to pentest applications with many vulnerabilities, providing invaluable experience for those new to the profession. With this experience under your belt, you could eventually transition to a larger company.

Mastering Interview Techniques

Given that we cannot cover everything, let’s go over the essential knowledge and skills you need to analyze vulnerabilities in web applications.

  • A pentester needs to understand how applications function on the network level, which includes knowing about TCP handshakes, domain names, IPs, proxies, etc. It is also important to grasp the basics of how HTTP and HTTPS protocols work. Being prepared to answer questions like “What is the difference between HTTP methods?” “When should PATCH be used as opposed to POST?” and “How do HTTP 0.9/1.1 differ from HTTP/2?” is a part of this foundational knowledge.
  • Vulnerabilities are not always tucked away in a web application’s code; sometimes, they are embedded in its architecture, like within the web server itself. Often, a pentester might not have a direct view of the application’s architecture but can infer how it functions. Therefore, having knowledge in this area is incredibly useful.
  • As vulnerabilities become more complex, it is important to grasp the basics. This foundational understanding allows you to tackle more complex issues as they arise.
  • Developing the ability to search for answers to your questions using open sources is vital, even if you have someone to ask. Always start by seeking out information and attempting to solve problems on your own before seeking help.
  • Being able to write and read code in various languages, including PHP, Python, JavaScript, Java, and C#, is essential. When it comes to analyzing web applications, you will encounter different approaches, such as white box, gray box, and black box testing. For example, if you are doing white box testing and have access to the application’s source code, having development experience is a big plus. Additionally, the ability to write automation scripts and tailor third-party tools to fit your needs is a valuable skill.
  • Pentest projects frequently require examining the application from the outside in. You need the ability to scan the network and identify vulnerable services to ensure no obvious security flaws are overlooked.
  • In your work, you will often need to theoretically explain the nature of a vulnerability. This requires understanding basic concepts, such as how databases operate, the properties of information, and what constitutes vulnerability and exploitation. Essential skills also include system administration for both Windows and Linux.

Simply studying a vast number of vulnerabilities will turn you into a top-tier professional because it does not cultivate the skill of discovering them. During actual pentest projects, the toughest part is often identifying vulnerabilities. It is advised to search for vulnerable applications and analyze them without peeking at the technology stack or hints about the vulnerabilities. This practice offers foundational experience and insights into how things operate in an actual project.

For those lacking a basic education in security analysis, paid penetration testing courses are an option to consider. Unfortunately, the better courses tend to be expensive, and it is difficult to recommend any budget-friendly options that are truly effective. It is crucial to realize that these courses will not turn you into an expert overnight, as some might claim, but they will provide you with a solid understanding of the profession.

InfoSec services | InfoSec books | Follow our blog | DISC llc is listed on The vCISO Directory | ISO 27k Chat bot

Tags: ASPIRING WHITE HATS


Next Page »